Standard Operating Procedure for Verifying Pharmacopoeial Analytical Methods in AMD
| Department | Analytical Method Development |
|---|---|
| SOP No. | SOP/AMD/204/2025 |
| Supersedes | SOP/AMD/204/2022 |
| Page No. | Page 1 of 13 |
| Issue Date | 21/05/2025 |
| Effective Date | 23/05/2025 |
| Review Date | 21/05/2026 |
1. Purpose
This SOP outlines the procedure for verifying pharmacopoeial analytical methods (e.g., USP, IP, BP, Ph.Eur.) to confirm their suitability for intended use in the Analytical Method Development (AMD) laboratory, in compliance with ICH
Q2(R1), GMP, and WHO TRS 996.
2. Scope
This SOP applies to all compendial methods adopted for testing of raw materials, in-process samples, and finished products in the Analytical Method Development department.
3. Responsibilities
- Analyst: Executes method verification protocol and performs data recording.
- Section Lead: Prepares and reviews method verification plan and results.
- QA Executive: Reviews the verification report and approves documentation.
- Department Head: Ensures compliance and signs off the final report.
4. Accountability
The Department Head of AMD is accountable for ensuring the verification of pharmacopoeial methods before their routine use in the lab.
5. Procedure
5.1 Review of Pharmacopoeial Method
- Review the selected monograph method from official compendia (e.g., USP, BP, IP).
- Identify method parameters such as:
- System suitability criteria
- Chromatographic conditions
- Sample and standard preparation
- Diluent composition
5.2 Planning of Method Verification
- Draft a Method Verification Protocol containing:
- Objective and scope
- Verification parameters: system suitability, accuracy, precision, specificity, LOD/LOQ (if applicable)
- Acceptance criteria (based on monograph or internal standards)
- List of reagents, columns, instruments, and materials
- Review and approval of protocol by QA before execution.
5.3 Execution of Verification
- Prepare system suitability standards and conduct runs to meet USP/EP/IP acceptance limits.
- Perform:
- Precision: minimum 6 replicate injections
- Accuracy: recovery at 3 levels (80%, 100%, 120%)
- Specificity: blank, placebo, and spiked samples
- Document chromatograms and raw data in Annexure-1 and Annexure-2.
5.4 Evaluation and Reporting
- Compile results in Annexure-3: Method Verification Report.
- Ensure %RSD, recovery, and specificity data meet criteria as per pharmacopoeial standards.
- Report any deviations and provide justification for acceptance or re-verification.
5.5 Approval and Archiving
- QA reviews the compiled verification report and signs off if compliant.
- Final report stored in the AMD archive for a minimum of 5 years.
6. Abbreviations
- SOP: Standard Operating Procedure
- QA: Quality Assurance
- USP: United States Pharmacopeia
- IP: Indian Pharmacopoeia
- BP: British Pharmacopoeia
- LOD: Limit of Detection
- LOQ: Limit of Quantification
7. Documents
- Chromatographic Results Log – Annexure-1
- Precision and Accuracy Worksheet – Annexure-2
- Method Verification Report – Annexure-3
8. References
- ICH Q2(R1): Validation of Analytical Procedures
- GMP Guidelines – Schedule M (India)
- WHO Technical Report Series 996
9. SOP Version
Version: 2.0
10. Approval Section
| Prepared By | Checked By | Approved By | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signature | |||
| Date | |||
| Name | Neha Bhatt | Ajit More | Sunita Reddy |
| Designation | Sr. Scientist | QA Reviewer | AMD Head |
| Department | Analytical Method Development | QA | Analytical Method Development |
11. Annexures
Annexure-1: Chromatographic Results Log
| Injection No. | Peak Area | Retention Time | System Suitability Pass |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1023456 | 5.03 | Yes |
| 2 | 1023401 | 5.01 | Yes |
Annexure-2: Precision and Accuracy Worksheet
| Level | Recovery % | % RSD | Acceptance Criteria | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80% | 98.5% | 1.2% | 95-105% | Pass |
| 100% | 99.8% | 0.9% | 95-105% | Pass |
| 120% | 101.2% | 1.1% | 95-105% | Pass |
Annexure-3: Method Verification Report
| Method Title | Assay of Ibuprofen – USP |
|---|---|
| Analyst | Neha Bhatt |
| Verification Date | 15/05/2025 |
| Verification Parameters | Precision, Accuracy, Specificity |
| Final Conclusion | Method suitable and verified for use |
Revision History:
| Revision Date | Revision No. | Details | Reason | Approved By |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21/05/2025 | 2.0 | Clarified scope, added Annexure-3 | Annual Review | Sunita Reddy |
| 10/03/2022 | 1.0 | Initial Issue | New SOP | QA Head |