SOP Guide for Pharma

Biosimilars: SOP for Stability Study of Engineered Clones – V 2.0


Biosimilars: SOP for Stability Study of Engineered Clones – V 2.0


Standard Operating Procedure for Stability Study of Engineered Clones in Biosimilars

Department Biosimilars
SOP No. SOP/BS/035/2025
Supersedes SOP/BS/035/2022
Page No. Page 1 of 13
Issue Date 04/05/2025
Effective Date 06/05/2025
Review Date 04/05/2026

1. Purpose

To define the procedure for conducting stability studies on engineered biosimilar-producing clones to assess their genetic and expression stability during prolonged culture, storage, and production cycles.

2. Scope

This SOP applies to the cell line development and process development teams involved in monitoring recombinant clones over extended passages and post-cryopreservation conditions for biosimilar manufacturing.

3. Responsibilities

4. Accountability

The Head of R&D is accountable for ensuring proper evaluation and documentation of clone stability prior to cell bank generation and regulatory filing.

5. Procedure

5.1 Stability Study Design

  1. Initiate study with 3 vials of selected clone from working cell bank (WCB).
  2. Passage cells serially for 30–60 generations under production culture conditions (shake flask or spinner flasks).
  3. Retain frozen aliquots at every 10th passage for interim analysis.

5.2 Expression Stability Testing

  1. Evaluate culture supernatant at P0, P10, P20, P30 using:
    • ELISA for protein titer
    • SDS-PAGE for band integrity
    • HPLC for glycosylation or aggregation profile (optional)
  2. Compare results to initial expression data. Variability should be within ±20%.

5.3 Genetic Stability Testing

  1. Isolate genomic DNA at P0 and final passage (e.g., P30 or P60).
  2. Confirm transgene integrity using:
    • PCR of expression cassette
    • Southern blot or qPCR for copy number
    • DNA sequencing (if applicable)
  3. Document no mutation, deletion, or rearrangement in critical regions.

5.4 Post-Thaw Stability

  1. Evaluate 3 freeze-thaw cycles from same clone batch for:
    • Viability after thawing
    • Recovery time to log-phase growth
    • Expression titer compared to pre-freeze levels

5.5 Data Evaluation and Acceptance Criteria

  1. Clone is considered stable if:
    • Expression remains within ±20% across passages
    • No change in copy number or integration site
    • No degradation in protein quality attributes

5.6 Documentation

  1. Record results in Clone Stability Log (Annexure-1).
  2. Summarize study outcome in Stability Report (Annexure-2) for QA approval.

6. Abbreviations

7. Documents

  1. Clone Stability Log (Annexure-1)
  2. Stability Study Report (Annexure-2)

8. References

9. SOP Version

Version: 2.0

10. Approval Section

Prepared By Checked By Approved By
Signature
Date
Name
Designation
Department

11. Annexures

Annexure-1: Clone Stability Log

Passage No. Viability (%) Titer (g/L) Copy Number Remarks Scientist
P0 94.8 1.02 5.1 Baseline Sunita Reddy
P30 93.2 1.04 5.0 Stable Sunita Reddy

Annexure-2: Stability Study Report

Clone ID Tested Passages Expression Variance Genetic Result Conclusion Approved By
C-035-A3 P0–P30 ±2.3% No Mutation Clone Stable

Revision History:

Revision Date Revision No. Revision Details Reason for Revision Approved By
04/05/2025 2.0 Included sequencing and freeze-thaw analysis Process validation update
Exit mobile version