Standard Operating Procedure for Evaluation of New Media Vendors in Biosimilar Manufacturing
| Department | Biosimilars |
|---|---|
| SOP No. | SOP/BS/145/2025 |
| Supersedes | SOP/BS/145/2022 |
| Page No. | Page 1 of 9 |
| Issue Date | 04/05/2025 |
| Effective Date | 06/05/2025 |
| Review Date | 04/05/2026 |
1. Purpose
To define the procedure for evaluating and qualifying new suppliers of culture media and supplements used in biosimilar manufacturing to ensure consistency, performance, and GMP compliance.
2. Scope
This SOP applies to the assessment, testing, approval, and qualification of new vendors supplying chemically defined or complex culture media for use in upstream biosimilar production.
3. Responsibilities
- Supply Chain: Initiate vendor registration, collect documentation, and coordinate audits.
- QA: Review vendor documentation and approve the qualification status.
- QC: Conduct media quality testing including sterility, pH, osmolality, and performance.
- Process Development: Perform comparability studies using cell lines in small-scale models.
4. Accountability
The QA Head is accountable for final approval of media vendors and ensuring all activities align with regulatory guidelines and internal quality policies.
5. Procedure
5.1 Vendor Registration
- Receive request for new vendor from Supply Chain.
- Collect vendor credentials, including:
- ISO/GMP certifications
- COA and Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)
- Quality Manual and change notification policy
- Fill Annexure-1: Vendor Registration Form.
5.2 Initial Screening
- QA to evaluate quality documents and conduct a risk assessment based on:
- Supplier history
- Geographic location
- Quality system robustness
- If satisfactory, approve initial sample evaluation.
5.3 Sample Evaluation
- Receive sample and test for:
- pH, osmolality, clarity
- Sterility, endotoxin, and mycoplasma
- Conduct small-scale culture study using internal reference clone and compare with reference media performance.
- Record data in Annexure-2: Media Performance Log.
5.4 Audit and Qualification
- Conduct on-site or virtual audit of the vendor if high-risk or critical media component is involved.
- Use Annexure-3: Vendor Audit Checklist to document observations.
- Assign status:
- Approved
- Conditionally Approved
- Rejected
5.5 Periodic Review
- Approved vendors must be re-evaluated every 2 years or upon a major change notification.
- Maintain performance tracking in Annexure-4: Annual Vendor Review Log.
6. Abbreviations
- QA: Quality Assurance
- QC: Quality Control
- MSDS: Material Safety Data Sheet
- COA: Certificate of Analysis
7. Documents
- Vendor Registration Form – Annexure-1
- Media Performance Log – Annexure-2
- Vendor Audit Checklist – Annexure-3
- Annual Vendor Review Log – Annexure-4
8. References
- ICH Q10 – Pharmaceutical Quality System
- EU GMP Chapter 5 – Production
- ISO 9001 – Quality Management Systems
9. SOP Version
Version: 2.0
10. Approval Section
| Prepared By | Checked By | Approved By | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signature | |||
| Date | |||
| Name | |||
| Designation | |||
| Department |
11. Annexures
Annexure-1: Vendor Registration Form
| Vendor Name | Location | Contact Person | Certifications | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioMedix Pvt. Ltd. | Hyderabad | Rajesh Kumar | ISO 9001, GMP | Under Review |
Annexure-2: Media Performance Log
| Media ID | Clone | Viability (%) | Growth Rate | Titer (g/L) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M-NEW-102 | CHO-GSK07 | 95% | 0.045/hr | 1.8 | Comparable |
Annexure-3: Vendor Audit Checklist
| Area | Observation | Compliant (Y/N) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Storage | Ambient control verified | Y | Meets specs |
Annexure-4: Annual Vendor Review Log
| Vendor | Review Date | Performance Score | Action | Reviewed By |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioMedix Pvt. Ltd. | 04/05/2025 | 93% | Retain | Sunita Reddy |
Revision History:
| Revision Date | Revision No. | Revision Details | Reason for Revision | Approved By |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/05/2025 | 2.0 | Expanded audit and performance review section | Enhancement of vendor oversight |