SOP Guide for Pharma

BA-BE Studies: SOP for Selection of Comparator Drugs for Global Submissions – V 2.0

BA-BE Studies: SOP for Selection of Comparator Drugs for Global Submissions – V 2.0

Standard Operating Procedure for Selection of Comparator Drugs for Global Submissions in BA/BE Studies

Department BA-BE Studies
SOP No. SOP/BA-BE/013/2025
Supersedes SOP/BA-BE/013/2022
Page No. Page 1 of 13
Issue Date 17/04/2025
Effective Date 20/04/2025
Review Date 17/04/2026

1. Purpose

To define the process for selecting appropriate comparator drugs (Reference Listed Drugs or Reference Medicinal Products) for global regulatory submissions, ensuring scientific validity and compliance with local authority expectations.

2. Scope

This SOP applies to Regulatory Affairs, Clinical Operations, and Procurement teams involved in global bioequivalence (BE) studies intended for submission in the United States, European Union, Canada, WHO, Australia, and other international markets.

3. Responsibilities

4. Accountability

The Head of Regulatory Affairs is accountable for ensuring comparator selection meets regulatory requirements for each target country and that the justification is properly documented.

5. Procedure

5.1 Identify Target Regulatory Market

  1. List countries where BE submission is planned.
  2. Document each country’s guidance for comparator selection in Annexure-1.

5.2 Determine Acceptable Comparator Source

  1. Acceptable sources per region include:
    • US: RLD as listed in the FDA Orange Book
    • EU: RMP authorized via centralized or national procedure (Community Register)
    • Canada: Canadian Reference Product listed in Health Canada Drug Database
    • WHO PQ: Comparator listed in WHO PQ Comparator Product List
  2. Record source verification using Annexure-2: Comparator Product Source Confirmation Log.

5.3 Selection Criteria

  1. Comparator must match:
    • Same strength and dosage form
    • Same route of administration
    • Marketed in the country of intended submission
  2. Same batch used throughout the BE study.

5.4 Justification for Global Use

  1. In case of single global study, select comparator product accepted by multiple agencies.
  2. Include scientific and regulatory justification in the protocol and submission dossier.
  3. If different comparators are used for different regions, clearly document batch usage and regulatory mapping.

5.5 Documentation Requirements

  1. Maintain comparator product invoice and Certificate of Analysis (CoA).
  2. Ensure product is stored under labeled and controlled conditions with FEFO system.
  3. Log comparator data in Annexure-3: Comparator Product Receipt Record.

5.6 Handling of Multiple Comparators

  1. If using more than one comparator across regions, ensure:
    • Separate documentation and retention for each
    • Defined bridging strategy (if applicable)
  2. Document study assignment in comparator mapping matrix (Annexure-4).

6. Abbreviations

7. Documents

  1. Target Market Comparator List – Annexure-1
  2. Comparator Product Source Confirmation Log – Annexure-2
  3. Comparator Product Receipt Record – Annexure-3
  4. Comparator Mapping Matrix – Annexure-4

8. References

9. SOP Version

Version: 2.0

10. Approval Section

Prepared By Checked By Approved By
Signature
Date
Name
Designation
Department

11. Annexures

Annexure-1: Target Market Comparator List

Region Comparator Name Reference Source Accepted By
USA ABC Tablet 100 mg Orange Book USFDA

Annexure-2: Comparator Product Source Confirmation Log

Date Product Supplier Country Verified By
12/04/2025 ABC 100 mg GlobalRx Inc. USA Rajesh Kumar

Annexure-3: Comparator Product Receipt Record

Batch No. Received Date Expiry Date Storage Condition Received By
CMP2211 14/04/2025 01/03/2026 25°C Sunita Reddy

Annexure-4: Comparator Mapping Matrix

Study ID Comparator Batch Country Submission Region Bridging Required
BE-001 CMP2211 USA US, Canada No

Revision History:

Revision Date Revision No. Details Reason Approved By
10/01/2022 1.0 Initial SOP New Document QA Head
17/04/2025 2.0 Added WHO comparator criteria and bridging matrix Regulatory Alignment QA Head
Exit mobile version