Standard Operating Procedure for CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) Management in API Manufacturing
| Department | API Manufacturing |
|---|---|
| SOP No. | SOP/API/163/2025 |
| Supersedes | SOP/API/163/2022 |
| Page No. | Page 1 of 13 |
| Issue Date | 14/04/2025 |
| Effective Date | 16/04/2025 |
| Review Date | 14/04/2026 |
1. Purpose
To define a robust and structured system for identifying, documenting, investigating, implementing, and tracking Corrective and Preventive Actions (CAPA) arising from deviations, audits, complaints, change controls, or quality failures in the API manufacturing process.
2. Scope
This SOP applies to all CAPAs initiated within the Quality Assurance (QA), Production, Quality Control (QC), Engineering, and Warehouse
departments of the API manufacturing facility. It covers both product-specific and system-related issues.
3. Responsibilities
- Initiator: Responsible for raising the CAPA based on identified non-conformance.
- CAPA Coordinator (QA): Responsible for coordinating investigations, reviews, and closure activities.
- Department Head: Assists in identifying root cause and implementation of assigned actions.
- QA Head: Final approver of all CAPAs, ensuring effectiveness and closure.
4. Accountability
The Quality Assurance Department is accountable for overall CAPA system implementation, timely execution, and continuous monitoring to prevent recurrence of quality failures.
5. Procedure
5.1 Sources for CAPA Initiation
CAPAs can be initiated from the following sources:
- Deviations
- Internal/External Audit Observations
- Product Complaints
- Out of Specification (OOS) / Out of Trend (OOT) Results
- Change Controls
- Regulatory Inspections
5.2 CAPA Initiation
- The concerned department shall raise a CAPA Request using the CAPA Initiation Form (Annexure-1).
- The form shall include:
- Reference source (Deviation No., Audit Observation No., etc.)
- Brief description of issue
- Immediate correction (if any)
- Submit the form to QA for review and entry into the CAPA Register (Annexure-2).
5.3 Investigation and Root Cause Analysis
- The QA representative shall coordinate with relevant department to initiate a detailed investigation.
- Investigation techniques may include:
- 5 Whys Analysis
- Ishikawa/Fishbone Diagram
- Brainstorming
- Document findings in the CAPA Investigation Report (Annexure-3).
5.4 Corrective and Preventive Action Planning
- Based on investigation, define:
- Corrective Actions: Actions taken to rectify existing non-conformities.
- Preventive Actions: Actions taken to eliminate potential causes and prevent recurrence.
- Assign responsible persons and timelines for each action.
- Record actions and due dates in the CAPA Tracker (Annexure-4).
5.5 Implementation and Effectiveness Check
- All actions must be implemented as per assigned deadlines.
- QA shall perform a follow-up to verify the completion and effectiveness of CAPA.
- Effectiveness check includes:
- Audit of revised process or document
- Training verification
- Monitoring of post-implementation results
5.6 CAPA Closure
- QA shall close the CAPA only after:
- Completion of all corrective and preventive actions
- Successful verification of effectiveness
- Approval by QA Head
- Mark the CAPA as ‘Closed’ in the CAPA Register with closure date and remarks.
5.7 Delayed CAPAs
- If CAPA is not completed by the due date:
- Extension may be requested with justification
- Revised timelines shall be approved by QA Head
- Delayed CAPAs shall be highlighted in monthly quality review meetings.
5.8 Trending and Metrics
- QA shall analyze CAPA trends monthly for:
- Frequent issues from the same source
- Recurrence of similar issues
- CAPA turnaround time (TAT)
- CAPA metrics shall be presented during Management Review Meetings.
6. Abbreviations
- CAPA: Corrective and Preventive Action
- QA: Quality Assurance
- QC: Quality Control
- OOS: Out of Specification
- OOT: Out of Trend
7. Documents
- CAPA Initiation Form (Annexure-1)
- CAPA Register (Annexure-2)
- CAPA Investigation Report (Annexure-3)
- CAPA Tracker (Annexure-4)
- Effectiveness Check Template
8. References
- ICH Q10 – Pharmaceutical Quality System
- 21 CFR Part 211 – Subpart J: Records and Reports
- WHO TRS No. 981 – Annex 2
9. SOP Version
Version: 2.0
10. Approval Section
| Prepared By | Checked By | Approved By | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signature | |||
| Date | |||
| Name | |||
| Designation | |||
| Department |
11. Annexures
Annexure-1: CAPA Initiation Form
| CAPA ID | Reference | Description | Raised By | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPA/2025/014 | DEV/2025/032 | Repeat deviation during granulation | Rajesh Kumar | 12/04/2025 |
Annexure-2: CAPA Register
| CAPA ID | Date | Source | Status | Closed On |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPA/2025/014 | 12/04/2025 | Deviation | Open | — |
Annexure-3: CAPA Investigation Report
| CAPA ID | Root Cause | Method Used | Investigated By |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAPA/2025/014 | Improper setup of granulator | 5 Whys | Sunita Reddy |
Annexure-4: CAPA Tracker
| Action | Type | Responsible | Due Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Train operators | Preventive | QA | 20/04/2025 | Ongoing |
Revision History:
| Revision Date | Revision No. | Details | Reason | Approved By |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/01/2022 | 1.0 | Initial Version | Implementation | QA Head |
| 14/04/2025 | 2.0 | Integrated tracker and effectiveness template | Improvement | QA Head |