Skip to content
  • Clinical Studies
  • Schedule M
  • Stability Studies
  • Pharma GMP
  • Pharma Tips
  • Pharma Books
  • Pharma Validation
  • Pharma Regulatory

SOP Guide for Pharma

The Ultimate Resource for Pharmaceutical SOPs and Best Practices

  • Home
  • Job Safety Analysis (JSA)
    • Oral Dosage Forms (Tablets & Capsules)
    • Oral Liquid Dosage Forms (Syrups, Elixirs, Suspensions, Emulsions)
    • Powder and Granule Dosage Forms
    • Topical Dosage Forms (Creams, Ointments, Gels, Lotions, Pastes)
    • Transdermal Dosage Forms (Patches)
  • Standard Test Procedures (STP)
  • SOP – Blog Post
  • Toggle search form

Analytical Method Development: UV Spectrophotometric Method Development – V 2.0

Posted on By

Analytical Method Development: UV Spectrophotometric Method Development – V 2.0

SOP for UV Spectrophotometric Method Development in AMD Laboratory


Department Analytical Method Development
SOP No. SOP/AMD/054/2025
Supersedes SOP/AMD/054/2022
Page No. Page 1 of 14
Issue Date 19/05/2025
Effective Date 20/05/2025
Review Date 19/05/2026

1. Purpose

This SOP describes the procedure for developing, optimizing, and validating UV spectrophotometric methods for quantitative analysis of pharmaceutical substances, including APIs, excipients, and finished dosage forms using UV-visible spectrophotometry.

2. Scope

This SOP applies to the Analytical Method Development (AMD) laboratory and includes selection of wavelength, preparation of standards, method linearity, system suitability, and validation activities in accordance with ICH Q2(R1) and pharmacopeial requirements.

3. Responsibilities

  • Analytical Scientist: Develops method, prepares standards/samples, records and interprets data.
  • Method Reviewer: Reviews calculations, spectrums, and validation reports.
  • QA Team: Ensures the method meets GMP documentation and compliance requirements.
  • Head – AMD: Provides final method approval for transfer to QC or for regulatory submission.

4. Accountability

The Head of the AMD department is accountable for ensuring all UV spectrophotometric methods developed are scientifically sound, validated, and regulatory compliant.

See also  Analytical Method Development: Stability-Indicating Method Development - V 2.0

5. Procedure

5.1 Wavelength Selection

  1. Prepare a 10 ppm standard solution of the analyte using a suitable solvent (e.g., methanol, water).
  2. Scan from 200 to 400 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer.
  3. Record the UV spectrum and identify the λmax (wavelength of maximum absorbance).
  4. Select λmax with maximum absorbance and minimum baseline noise for quantification.
  5. Record spectrum in Annexure-1: UV Spectrum Report.

5.2 Standard and Sample Preparation

  1. Use a certified reference material to prepare a 1000 ppm stock solution.
  2. Prepare working standard solutions in the range of 50–150% of the expected analyte concentration (typically 5–25 ppm).
  3. Use the same diluent as used in final product preparation.
  4. Filter all solutions using a 0.45 µm filter before analysis.
  5. Prepare test sample solution following product-specific procedures.

5.3 Calibration Curve and Linearity

  1. Measure absorbance of each standard solution at λmax.
  2. Plot absorbance vs. concentration to generate calibration curve.
  3. Calculate correlation coefficient (R²); accept R² ≥ 0.999.
  4. Document calibration data in Annexure-2: Calibration Curve Worksheet.

5.4 Method Optimization Parameters

  1. Study the effect of:
    • Solvent selection (water, methanol, ethanol)
    • pH (using phosphate or acetate buffer if needed)
    • Reaction time (if applicable)
    • Path length of cuvette (1 cm standard)
  2. Identify and justify the most stable and reproducible conditions.
  3. Record all optimization trials in Annexure-3: Method Optimization Log.
See also  Analytical Method Development: Forced Degradation Studies - V 2.0

5.5 Method Validation

  1. Validate the method as per ICH Q2(R1) guidelines:
  2. Specificity: Confirm no interference at λmax from excipients or diluents.
  3. Linearity: R² ≥ 0.999 across working range.
  4. Accuracy: Recovery between 98% and 102% at 80%, 100%, and 120% levels.
  5. Precision:
    • Repeatability: RSD ≤ 2.0% for 6 replicates at 100% level.
    • Intermediate Precision: Repeat on different days or analysts.
  6. LOD and LOQ: Based on standard deviation of response and slope (3.3×σ/S for LOD, 10×σ/S for LOQ).
  7. Robustness: Vary parameters such as wavelength (±2 nm), temperature, and solvent.
  8. Solution Stability: Evaluate sample/standard stability at room temperature for up to 24 hours.
  9. Document validation results in Annexure-4: Validation Summary Report.

5.6 System Suitability

  1. Inject standard solution six times.
  2. Calculate % RSD of absorbance values.
  3. Acceptable RSD ≤ 2.0% for absorbance measurements.
  4. Document results in Annexure-5: System Suitability Record.

6. Abbreviations

  • SOP: Standard Operating Procedure
  • UV: Ultraviolet
  • ICH: International Council for Harmonisation
  • RSD: Relative Standard Deviation
  • LOD: Limit of Detection
  • LOQ: Limit of Quantification
  • λmax: Wavelength of Maximum Absorbance

7. Documents

  1. UV Spectrum Report – Annexure-1
  2. Calibration Curve Worksheet – Annexure-2
  3. Method Optimization Log – Annexure-3
  4. Validation Summary Report – Annexure-4
  5. System Suitability Record – Annexure-5
See also  Analytical Method Development: Use of Design of Experiments (DoE) in Method Development - V 2.0

8. References

  • ICH Q2(R1) – Validation of Analytical Procedures
  • USP <857> – Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy
  • IP Appendix – UV Spectrophotometric Assays
  • Ph. Eur. 2.2.25 – UV-visible absorption spectrophotometry

9. SOP Version

Version: 2.0

10. Approval Section

Prepared By Checked By Approved By
Signature
Date
Name
Designation
Department

11. Annexures

Annexure-1: UV Spectrum Report

Sample Name Concentration (ppm) λmax (nm) Observed Peak Analyst
API-A 10 272 0.864 Sunita Reddy

Annexure-2: Calibration Curve Worksheet

Concentration (ppm) Absorbance
5 0.425
10 0.851
15 1.275
20 1.694
25 2.115

Annexure-3: Method Optimization Log

Trial No. Solvent λmax (nm) Observation Conclusion
1 Methanol 272 Stable peak Accepted
2 Water 271 Peak broadening Rejected

Annexure-4: Validation Summary Report

Parameter Acceptance Criteria Result Status
Precision RSD ≤ 2% 1.3% Pass
Accuracy 98–102% 99.4% Pass
Linearity R² ≥ 0.999 0.9998 Pass

Annexure-5: System Suitability Record

Injection Absorbance
1 0.852
2 0.856
3 0.851
4 0.854
5 0.853
6 0.855

Revision History:

Revision Date Revision No. Details Reason Approved By
04/05/2025 2.0 Expanded method validation and updated annexures Regulatory alignment
Analytical Method Development V 2.0 Tags:Analytical Method Development SOP, SOP for analytical calculations, SOP for analytical documentation, SOP for analytical instrument calibration, SOP for analytical instrument qualification, SOP for analytical method change control, SOP for analytical method deviation handling, SOP for analytical method documentation practices, SOP for analytical method lifecycle management, SOP for analytical method optimization, SOP for analytical method risk assessment, SOP for analytical method training and competency, SOP for analytical method transfer protocol, SOP for analytical method validation, SOP for forced degradation studies, SOP for HPLC method development, SOP for limit of detection (LOD) determination, SOP for limit of quantitation (LOQ) determination, SOP for method accuracy testing, SOP for method linearity assessment, SOP for method precision evaluation, SOP for method reproducibility, SOP for method robustness testing, SOP for method transfer, SOP for method verification, SOP for qualification of working standards, SOP for reference standard handling, SOP for specificity testing in analytical methods, SOP for stability indicating methods, SOP for system suitability testing

Post navigation

Previous Post: BA-BE Studies: SOP for Temperature Excursion Notification and Documentation – V 2.0
Next Post: Aerosol: SOP for Calibration of Pressure Gauges in Utility Systems – V 2.0

Standard Operating Procedures V 1.0

  • Aerosols
  • Analytical Method Development
  • Bioequivalence Bioavailability Study
  • Capsule Formulation
  • Clinical Studies
  • Creams
  • Data Integrity
  • Dental Dosage Forms
  • Drug Discovery
  • Environment, Health and Safety
  • Formulation Development
  • Gels
  • Good Distribution Practice
  • Good Warehousing Practices
  • In-Process Control
  • Injectables
  • Liquid Orals
  • Liposome and Emulsion Formulations
  • Lotions
  • Lyophilized Products
  • Maintenance Dept.
  • Medical Devices
  • Metered-Dose Inhaler
  • Microbiology Testing
  • Nanoparticle Formulation
  • Nasal Spray Formulations
  • Nebulizers
  • Ocular (Eye) Dosage Forms
  • Ointments
  • Otic (Ear) Dosage Forms
  • Pharmacovigilance
  • Powder & Granules
  • Purchase Departments
  • Quality Assurance
  • Quality Control
  • Raw Material Stores
  • Regulatory Affairs
  • Tablet Manufacturing
  • Rectal Dosage Forms
  • Transdermal Patches
  • Vaginal Dosage Forms
  • Validations and Qualifications

Read SOPs in your Language:

 - 
Bengali
 - 
bn
English
 - 
en
Gujarati
 - 
gu
Hindi
 - 
hi
Malayalam
 - 
ml
Marathi
 - 
mr
Punjabi
 - 
pa
Tamil
 - 
ta
Telugu
 - 
te

NEW! Revised SOPs – V 2.0

  • Aerosols V 2.0
  • Analytical Method Development V 2.0
  • API Manufacturing V 2.0
  • BA-BE Studies V 2.0
  • Biosimilars V 2.0
  • Capsules V 2.0
  • Creams V 2.0
  • Elixers V 2.0
  • Ointments V 2.0
  • Raw Material Warehouse V 2.0
  • Tablet Manufacturing V2.0

New Publication: A must for All.

Copyright © 2025 SOP Guide for Pharma.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

Go to mobile version