Skip to content
  • Clinical Studies
  • Schedule M
  • Stability Studies
  • Pharma GMP
  • Pharma Tips
  • Pharma Books
  • Pharma Validation
  • Pharma Regulatory

SOP Guide for Pharma

The Ultimate Resource for Pharmaceutical SOPs and Best Practices

  • Home
  • SOP Guidelines
    • SOP Development
    • SOP Training
    • SOP Compliance Monitoring
    • SOP Revision Processes
    • Pharmaceutical SOP templates
    • GMP documentation SOP
    • Data integrity SOP pharma
    • Manufacturing SOP pharmaceutical
    • FDA SOP guidance
    • eQMS SOP workflows
  • Job Safety Analysis (JSA)
    • Oral Dosage Forms (Tablets & Capsules)
    • Oral Liquid Dosage Forms (Syrups, Elixirs, Suspensions, Emulsions)
    • Powder and Granule Dosage Forms
    • Topical Dosage Forms (Creams, Ointments, Gels, Lotions, Pastes)
    • Transdermal Dosage Forms (Patches)
  • Standard Test Procedures (STP)
  • GMP Audit Findings
    • Non-Compliance
      • SOP Absence
      • Revision Control
      • Non-Adherence
      • Poor Writing
      • Training Failure
      • Data Integrity Gaps
      • Mismatch Between SOPs and Practice
      • Critical Operations
      • Regulatory Change
      • Emergency Changes
      • Third-Party SOPs
      • Inspection Readiness
      • Deviation Handling
      • CAPA Integration
      • Validation Alignment
      • System Integration
      • Uncontrolled Distribution
      • SOP Implementation Gaps
      • SOP Alignment with Validation
      • Change Control Linkage
  • Toggle search form

Analytical Method Development: SOP for Intermediate Precision Evaluation – V 2.0

Posted on By

Analytical Method Development: SOP for Intermediate Precision Evaluation – V 2.0

Standard Operating Procedure for Evaluation of Intermediate Precision in Analytical Method Development


Department Analytical Method Development
SOP No. SOP/AMD/366/2025
Supersedes SOP/AMD/366/2022
Page No. Page 1 of 13
Issue Date 01/06/2025
Effective Date 04/06/2025
Review Date 01/06/2027

1. Purpose

This SOP defines the process for evaluating intermediate precision (also known as ruggedness) of analytical methods developed within the Analytical Method Development department. Intermediate precision demonstrates the reproducibility of results when the method is performed under

different conditions such as different analysts, instruments, days, or laboratories.

2. Scope

This SOP applies to all personnel involved in method development activities for APIs, excipients, and pharmaceutical formulations who are responsible for conducting and evaluating intermediate precision as part of method validation or verification studies.

3. Responsibilities

  • Analyst A and Analyst B: Independently perform the test using the same method on different days or using different instruments.
  • Method Development Team Lead: Plans the intermediate precision strategy, verifies experimental conditions, and reviews compiled data.
  • QA Reviewer: Audits the precision data for accuracy and completeness and ensures it aligns with validation protocol.
See also  Analytical Method Development: Mass Spectral Fragmentation Analysis SOP - V 2.0

4. Accountability

The Head of Analytical Method Development is accountable for ensuring that intermediate precision evaluations are planned, executed, reviewed, and documented in compliance with ICH Q2(R1) guidelines and internal SOP requirements.

5. Procedure

5.1 Experimental Design

  1. Use a minimum of two analysts, two instruments, and two days for the study.
  2. Conduct the study at the target concentration (100%) using six independent sample preparations per analyst.
  3. Ensure consistency in reagents, glassware, and method parameters across the analysts.

5.2 Sample Preparation and Analysis

  1. Each analyst shall prepare six replicate sample solutions independently and analyze them as per the finalized method.
  2. Record all chromatographic/spectroscopic responses and calculate individual assay or test values.
  3. Ensure that each batch includes a system suitability check and meets the predefined acceptance criteria.
See also  Analytical Method Development: SOP for Calibration of UV-Visible Spectrophotometer - V 2.0

5.3 Statistical Evaluation

  1. Calculate the % assay for each sample from each analyst separately.
  2. Determine the Mean, Standard Deviation (SD), and % Relative Standard Deviation (%RSD) for each set and combined sets.
  3. Acceptable %RSD should generally be ≤ 2.0% for assay methods. For impurity methods, acceptance criteria may vary and must be justified.
  4. Perform One-way ANOVA if required to assess statistical significance between analyst results.

5.4 Data Compilation and Review

  1. Document raw data, calculations, instrument printouts, and observations in Annexure-1.
  2. Compile results from both analysts in a comparative format in Annexure-2.
  3. Summarize findings and conclusions in Annexure-3: Precision Evaluation Summary Sheet.

6. Abbreviations

  • RSD: Relative Standard Deviation
  • SD: Standard Deviation
  • ANOVA: Analysis of Variance
  • ICH: International Council for Harmonisation
  • QA: Quality Assurance

7. Documents

  1. Annexure-1: Raw Data and Calculations Sheet
  2. Annexure-2: Comparative Results Table
  3. Annexure-3: Precision Evaluation Summary Sheet

8. References

  • ICH Q2(R1): Validation of Analytical Procedures
  • USP General Chapter <1225> Validation of Compendial Procedures
  • 21 CFR Part 211 – Current Good Manufacturing Practice
See also  Analytical Method Development: Wavelength Scanning and Selection SOP - V 2.0

9. SOP Version

Version: 2.0

10. Approval Section

Prepared By Checked By Approved By
Signature
Date
Name Neha Thakur Manoj Pillai Dr. Ravi Mehta
Designation Analyst QA Reviewer Head – AMD
Department Analytical Method Development Quality Assurance Analytical Method Development

11. Annexures

Annexure-1: Raw Data and Calculations

Sample Analyst A (% Assay) Analyst B (% Assay)
1 98.7 98.4
2 99.0 98.8
3 98.6 98.9
4 98.9 98.7
5 98.5 98.6
6 98.8 98.5

Annexure-2: Comparative Results Summary

  • Mean (Analyst A): 98.75%
  • Mean (Analyst B): 98.65%
  • Overall RSD: 0.21%

Annexure-3: Precision Evaluation Summary

The intermediate precision study demonstrates consistent and reproducible results across analysts and days. The %RSD values are within acceptance criteria. No significant analyst-to-analyst variation was observed. The method is considered rugged under intended conditions.

Revision History

Revision Date Revision No. Description Reason Approved By
01/06/2025 2.0 Enhanced study design to include multiple instruments Annual Review Dr. Ravi Mehta
12/08/2022 1.0 Initial SOP Implementation New Method Validation QA Head
Analytical Method Development V 2.0 Tags:Analytical Method Development SOP, SOP for analytical calculations, SOP for analytical documentation, SOP for analytical instrument calibration, SOP for analytical instrument qualification, SOP for analytical method change control, SOP for analytical method deviation handling, SOP for analytical method documentation practices, SOP for analytical method lifecycle management, SOP for analytical method optimization, SOP for analytical method risk assessment, SOP for analytical method training and competency, SOP for analytical method transfer protocol, SOP for analytical method validation, SOP for forced degradation studies, SOP for HPLC method development, SOP for limit of detection (LOD) determination, SOP for limit of quantitation (LOQ) determination, SOP for method accuracy testing, SOP for method linearity assessment, SOP for method precision evaluation, SOP for method reproducibility, SOP for method robustness testing, SOP for method transfer, SOP for method verification, SOP for qualification of working standards, SOP for reference standard handling, SOP for specificity testing in analytical methods, SOP for stability indicating methods, SOP for system suitability testing

Post navigation

Previous Post: Analytical Method Development: SOP for Linearity and Range Evaluation – V 2.0
Next Post: Analytical Method Development: SOP for Accuracy Study Using Recovery Method – V 2.0

Standard Operating Procedures V 1.0

  • Aerosols
  • Analytical Method Development
  • Bioequivalence Bioavailability Study
  • Capsule Formulation
  • Clinical Studies
  • Creams
  • Data Integrity
  • Dental Dosage Forms
  • Drug Discovery
  • Environment, Health and Safety
  • Formulation Development
  • Gels
  • Good Distribution Practice
  • Good Warehousing Practices
  • In-Process Control
  • Injectables
  • Liquid Orals
  • Liposome and Emulsion Formulations
  • Lotions
  • Lyophilized Products
  • Maintenance Dept.
  • Medical Devices
  • Metered-Dose Inhaler
  • Microbiology Testing
  • Nanoparticle Formulation
  • Nasal Spray Formulations
  • Nebulizers
  • Ocular (Eye) Dosage Forms
  • Ointments
  • Otic (Ear) Dosage Forms
  • Pharmacovigilance
  • Powder & Granules
  • Purchase Departments
  • Quality Assurance
  • Quality Control
  • Raw Material Stores
  • Regulatory Affairs
  • Tablet Manufacturing
  • Rectal Dosage Forms
  • Transdermal Patches
  • Vaginal Dosage Forms
  • Validations and Qualifications

Read SOPs in your Language:

 - 
Bengali
 - 
bn
English
 - 
en
Gujarati
 - 
gu
Hindi
 - 
hi
Malayalam
 - 
ml
Marathi
 - 
mr
Punjabi
 - 
pa
Tamil
 - 
ta
Telugu
 - 
te

NEW! Revised SOPs – V 2.0

  • Aerosols V 2.0
  • Analytical Method Development V 2.0
  • API Manufacturing V 2.0
  • BA-BE Studies V 2.0
  • Biosimilars V 2.0
  • Capsules V 2.0
  • Creams V 2.0
  • Elixers V 2.0
  • Gels V 2.0
  • Injectables V 2.0
  • Ointments V 2.0
  • Raw Material Warehouse V 2.0
  • Tablet Manufacturing V2.0

New Publication: A must for All.

Copyright © 2026 SOP Guide for Pharma.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

Go to mobile version