SOP Guide for Pharma

Analytical Method Development: Analytical Control Strategy Development – V 2.0

Analytical Method Development: Analytical Control Strategy Development – V 2.0

SOP for Developing Analytical Control Strategy in Method Development


Department Analytical Method Development
SOP No. SOP/AMD/018/2025
Supersedes SOP/AMD/018/2022
Page No. Page 1 of 15
Issue Date 19/05/2025
Effective Date 20/05/2025
Review Date 19/05/2026

1. Purpose

This SOP defines the process for developing an analytical control strategy during the lifecycle of analytical method development. The strategy ensures control over method parameters and analytical performance to deliver reliable, reproducible, and regulatory-compliant results in line with ICH Q8, Q10, and Q14.

2. Scope

This SOP applies to all personnel involved in analytical method development, optimization, validation, transfer, and lifecycle management within the Analytical Method Development (AMD) department.

3. Responsibilities

4. Accountability

The Head of AMD is accountable for establishing and maintaining analytical control strategies that ensure method consistency and fitness for use throughout its lifecycle.

5. Procedure

5.1 Identify Method Performance Requirements

  1. Define Analytical Target Profile (ATP) (refer to SOP/AMD/015/2025).
  2. Identify critical method attributes (CMAs) such as resolution, retention time, %RSD, tailing factor, and linearity.
  3. Document in Annexure-1: Method Performance Requirement Log.

5.2 Risk-Based Identification of Critical Method Parameters (CMPs)

  1. Based on DoE or prior experience, identify parameters impacting CMAs:
    • Mobile phase pH and composition
    • Flow rate
    • Column type
    • Injection volume
    • Temperature
  2. Perform FMEA or Ishikawa analysis for risk prioritization.
  3. Summarize results in Annexure-2: CMP Risk Assessment Table.

5.3 Define Acceptable Ranges and Controls

  1. Establish acceptable operating ranges for CMPs from:
    • DOE study data
    • Historical batch data
    • System suitability trends
  2. Include:
    • System suitability tests
    • Sample preparation checks
    • Equipment calibration and condition checks
  3. Record all controls in Annexure-3: Analytical Control Strategy Matrix.

5.4 Establish Monitoring and Review Mechanism

  1. Define how each control parameter will be monitored (e.g., through chromatographic system suitability or procedural checklists).
  2. Set frequency of monitoring:
    • Per batch for routine tests
    • Monthly or quarterly for trend analysis
  3. Assign responsibility for periodic review.

5.5 Documentation and Lifecycle Integration

  1. Integrate the control strategy into:
    • Method Development Reports
    • Validation Protocols
    • Analytical Method Transfer Documents
  2. Maintain version-controlled records with rationale for all limits.
  3. Update strategy based on:
    • OOS investigations
    • Change controls
    • Regulatory updates

6. Abbreviations

7. Documents

  1. Method Performance Requirement Log – Annexure-1
  2. CMP Risk Assessment Table – Annexure-2
  3. Analytical Control Strategy Matrix – Annexure-3

8. References

9. SOP Version

Version: 2.0

10. Approval Section

Prepared By Checked By Approved By
Signature
Date
Name
Designation
Department

11. Annexures

Annexure-1: Method Performance Requirement Log

Attribute Acceptance Criteria Justification
Resolution ≥ 2.0 To ensure separation from impurity
Retention Time ± 0.2 min To control variability

Annexure-2: CMP Risk Assessment Table

Parameter Severity Occurrence Detection Risk Score
pH of Mobile Phase 4 3 2 24

Annexure-3: Analytical Control Strategy Matrix

Control Parameter Range Monitoring Method Action Limit
Column Temperature 30 ± 2°C System Logger ± 3°C
Mobile Phase Composition ±2% Organic Batch Record Verification Deviation triggers OOS review

Revision History:

Revision Date Revision No. Details Reason Approved By
04/05/2025 2.0 Added Annexure-3 and lifecycle review step ICH Q14 compliance
Exit mobile version