SOP for Re-Evaluation of Stability Failures
Department | Aerosol |
---|---|
SOP No. | SOP/Aerosol/109/2025 |
Supersedes | SOP/Aerosol/109/2022 |
Page No. | Page 1 of Y |
Issue Date | 06/02/2025 |
Effective Date | 16/02/2025 |
Review Date | 06/02/2028 |
1. Purpose
This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) outlines the process for the re-evaluation of stability failures observed during the stability testing of aerosol products. The purpose of this procedure is to investigate the causes of stability failures, implement corrective actions, and ensure that products meet the required stability specifications. This process helps to guarantee that aerosol products maintain their safety, quality, and efficacy during their shelf life.
2. Scope
This SOP applies to all aerosol products at [Company Name] that have failed stability tests during long-term, accelerated, or intermediate studies. It includes the process of identifying, investigating, documenting, and resolving stability failures in aerosol formulations or their packaging.
3. Responsibilities
- Stability Testing Team: Responsible for identifying stability failures, documenting the results, and initiating the re-evaluation process.
- Quality Assurance (QA) Team: Responsible for overseeing the re-evaluation process, ensuring proper documentation, and verifying that corrective actions are taken in response to stability failures.
- Production Team: Responsible for providing additional information related to the batch manufacturing process and identifying potential causes of stability issues related to production.
- Regulatory Affairs Team: Ensures that the re-evaluation of stability failures meets the
4. Accountability
The Manufacturing Manager is accountable for ensuring that the re-evaluation of stability failures is conducted according to this SOP. The overall compliance with this SOP is overseen by the Quality Assurance (QA) Manager.
5. Procedure
5.1. Identification of Stability Failures
- Stability failures can be identified during regular stability testing at predefined intervals, including long-term, accelerated, or intermediate testing conditions. Failures may include changes in product appearance, chemical composition, performance (e.g., spray rate, valve function), or physical properties (e.g., viscosity, pH).
- Once a stability failure is observed, it must be documented in the Stability Failure Log (Annexure-1). The log should include the batch number, test conditions, observed failure, and date of the failure identification.
- The product must be reviewed to determine if the failure is isolated to a specific batch or if it is a recurring issue across multiple batches.
5.2. Investigation of Stability Failures
- The Stability Testing Team should investigate the root cause of the failure. This investigation should include:
- Reviewing the formulation and manufacturing process for potential issues (e.g., incorrect raw material usage, formulation instability, improper packaging).
- Checking the storage conditions and handling of the samples during stability testing to ensure they were tested under correct conditions.
- Examining the stability chamber conditions, including calibration of temperature and humidity controls, to ensure proper testing conditions were maintained.
- Determining if external factors (e.g., transportation, environmental exposure) could have contributed to the failure.
- The team should conduct further tests on the failed batch if necessary, using alternative or modified test methods (e.g., additional chemical tests or accelerated stability testing) to verify the cause of the failure.
- Any findings from the investigation should be documented in the Investigation Report (Annexure-2), which should include the suspected root cause and a proposed action plan for corrective measures.
5.3. Corrective Actions
- If the root cause of the failure is identified, corrective actions should be implemented to address the issue. These actions may include:
- Reformulating the product to address instability issues
- Modifying the manufacturing process or improving raw material quality
- Changing the packaging material or design to improve protection from light, air, or moisture
- Improving stability testing procedures or equipment to avoid similar issues in future testing
- Corrective actions should be documented in the Corrective Action Log (Annexure-3) and should include the specific steps taken, the person responsible for each action, and the completion date.
- The QA team should review and approve the corrective actions to ensure they are appropriate and effective.
5.4. Re-testing of Corrected Batches
- If the corrective actions are implemented, the affected batch or subsequent batches should be re-tested under the same stability conditions to confirm that the changes have resolved the stability issues.
- The re-testing results should be documented in the Stability Re-test Log (Annexure-4) and compared with previous stability data to verify the product’s stability performance after corrective actions.
- Once the re-testing confirms that the product is stable, the results should be reviewed and approved by the QA team before the product is released for further processing or distribution.
5.5. Documentation and Reporting
- All documentation related to the re-evaluation of stability failures should be stored securely for regulatory review. The following documents must be maintained:
- Stability Failure Log (Annexure-1)
- Investigation Report (Annexure-2)
- Corrective Action Log (Annexure-3)
- Stability Re-test Log (Annexure-4)
- All documentation should be signed and dated by the responsible personnel and reviewed periodically by the QA team to ensure compliance with internal procedures and regulatory requirements.
6. Abbreviations
- GMP: Good Manufacturing Practice
- QA: Quality Assurance
- SOP: Standard Operating Procedure
- RH: Relative Humidity
- CFR: Code of Federal Regulations
- CAPA: Corrective and Preventive Action
7. Documents
- Stability Failure Log (Annexure-1)
- Investigation Report (Annexure-2)
- Corrective Action Log (Annexure-3)
- Stability Re-test Log (Annexure-4)
8. References
This SOP is based on the following regulatory guidelines and industry standards:
- Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Guidelines
- FDA Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21, Part 211
- International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) Guidelines
9. SOP Version
Version: 2.0
10. Approval Section
Prepared By | Checked By | Approved By | |
---|---|---|---|
Signature | |||
Date | |||
Name | |||
Designation | |||
Department |
11. Annexures
Annexure-1: Stability Failure Log
Batch Number | Test Date | Failure Type | Test Conditions | Failure Description | Operator Name |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batch-001 | 10/02/2025 | Chemical instability | 25°C/60% RH | Discoloration observed | Rajesh Patel |
Annexure-2: Investigation Report
Investigation ID | Investigation Date | Root Cause | Corrective Action | Investigator Name |
---|---|---|---|---|
INV-54321 | 12/02/2025 | Incorrect formulation component | Reformulation with new component | Rajesh Patel |
Annexure-3: Corrective Action Log
Action ID | Action Description | Assigned To | Completion Date | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|
ACT-12345 | Reformulated product | Rajesh Patel | 15/02/2025 | Successfully resolved |
Annexure-4: Stability Re-test Log
Batch Number | Re-test Date | Test Conditions | Re-test Results | Operator Name |
---|---|---|---|---|
Batch-001 | 15/02/2025 | 25°C/60% RH | Pass | Rajesh Patel |
12. Revision History:
Revision Date | Revision No. | Revision Details | Reason for Revision | Approved By | Page No. | Ref. Point No. | Details of Revision |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/01/2024 | V 1.0 | Initial Release | First Issue | Anjali Sharma | Page 1 | [Ref Point] | First Release |
01/01/2025 | V 2.0 | Updated failure investigation process | To comply with updated GMP regulations | Anjali Sharma | Page 1 | [Ref Point] | Updated procedures |