Skip to content
  • Clinical Studies
  • Pharma GMP
  • Pharma Tips
  • Stability Studies
  • Pharma Books
  • Schedule M

SOP Guide for Pharma

The Ultimate Resource for Pharmaceutical SOPs and Best Practices

  • Home
  • Job Safety Analysis (JSA)
    • Oral Dosage Forms (Tablets & Capsules)
    • Oral Liquid Dosage Forms (Syrups, Elixirs, Suspensions, Emulsions)
    • Powder and Granule Dosage Forms
    • Topical Dosage Forms (Creams, Ointments, Gels, Lotions, Pastes)
    • Transdermal Dosage Forms (Patches)
  • Standard Test Procedures (STP)
  • SOP – Blog Post
  • Toggle search form

Analytical Method Development: Forced Degradation Studies – V 2.0

Posted on By

Analytical Method Development: Forced Degradation Studies – V 2.0

SOP for Conducting Forced Degradation Studies in Analytical Method Development


Department Analytical Method Development
SOP No. SOP/AMD/011/2025
Supersedes SOP/AMD/011/2022
Page No. Page 1 of 15
Issue Date 19/05/2025
Effective Date 20/05/2025
Review Date 19/05/2026

1. Purpose

This SOP defines the procedure for conducting forced degradation studies to establish the stability-indicating capability of an analytical method. It ensures that degradation pathways are understood and that the method can accurately quantify the active ingredient in the presence of degradants, as per ICH Q1A and Q2(R1).

2. Scope

This SOP applies to all drug substances (APIs) and drug products undergoing analytical method development in the Analytical Method Development (AMD) department for establishing stability-indicating methods.

3. Responsibilities

  • Analytical Scientist: Designs and executes forced degradation studies, documents data, and interprets results.
  • Team Lead: Reviews degradation profiles and approves stress conditions and duration.
  • QA: Verifies compliance of degradation protocols with ICH and internal documentation procedures.
  • Head – AMD: Approves final degradation report for submission and reference.
See also  Analytical Method Development: Development of Test Procedures for Formulations - V 2.0

4. Accountability

The Head of AMD is accountable for ensuring forced degradation studies are conducted in a scientifically sound and regulatory-compliant manner and that conclusions are properly justified and documented.

5. Procedure

5.1 Planning and Setup

  1. Conduct a literature review and consult pharmacopoeial or internal sources to understand known degradation pathways.
  2. Select appropriate stress conditions:
    • Acidic and basic hydrolysis
    • Oxidation
    • Thermal degradation
    • Photolytic degradation
    • Humidity stress (as applicable)
  3. Record plan in Annexure-1: Forced Degradation Study Plan.

5.2 Sample Preparation

  1. Prepare:
    • API solution
    • Placebo (for formulations)
    • Product solution (where applicable)
  2. Use appropriate diluent as per target method and known solubility.
  3. Label all samples with stress condition, batch ID, analyst initials, and date.

5.3 Stress Conditions

  1. Acid Hydrolysis: Treat sample with 0.1N HCl at 60°C for 2 hours.
  2. Base Hydrolysis: Treat with 0.1N NaOH at 60°C for 2 hours.
  3. Oxidation: Use 3% hydrogen peroxide at 25°C for 1 hour.
  4. Thermal: Expose dry powder to 80°C for 48 hours.
  5. Photolytic: Expose to UV light (200 watt hours/m2) for 1.2 million lux hours.
  6. Document all stress conditions in Annexure-2: Stress Condition Log.

5.4 Neutralization and Sample Analysis

  1. Neutralize acidic or basic samples before injection:
    • Acid stress: Neutralize with equimolar NaOH
    • Base stress: Neutralize with equimolar HCl
  2. Filter all samples through 0.45 µm membrane filters.
  3. Inject on validated/optimized analytical method (typically HPLC or UPLC).
See also  Analytical Method Development: Troubleshooting Methods Developed in AMD - V 2.0

5.5 Data Interpretation

  1. Compare degraded samples to:
    • Blank
    • Placebo
    • Undegraded sample
  2. Determine:
    • Extent of degradation (target 5–20%)
    • Peak purity using PDA or mass spec where available
    • Presence of co-eluting degradation products
  3. Record observations in Annexure-3: Degradation Profile Summary.

5.6 Reporting and Documentation

  1. Compile data including chromatograms, overlays, and tables.
  2. Prepare a final report using Annexure-4: Forced Degradation Report Format.
  3. Submit report to QA and Head – AMD for final approval.
  4. Archive electronically and in physical records with controlled access.

6. Abbreviations

  • API: Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient
  • HPLC: High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
  • PDA: Photodiode Array Detector
  • QA: Quality Assurance
  • UV: Ultraviolet
  • SOP: Standard Operating Procedure

7. Documents

  1. Forced Degradation Study Plan – Annexure-1
  2. Stress Condition Log – Annexure-2
  3. Degradation Profile Summary – Annexure-3
  4. Forced Degradation Report Format – Annexure-4

8. References

  • ICH Q1A(R2) – Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products
  • ICH Q2(R1) – Validation of Analytical Procedures
  • USP General Chapter <1225> – Validation of Compendial Procedures
  • FDA Guidance for Industry – Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation

9. SOP Version

Version: 2.0

10. Approval Section

Prepared By Checked By Approved By
Signature
Date
Name
Designation
Department

11. Annexures

Annexure-1: Forced Degradation Study Plan

API Formulation Study ID Initiated By Date
Amlodipine Tablet FDS/2025/03 Ajay Mehra 10/04/2025

Annexure-2: Stress Condition Log

Condition Details Duration Temperature Remarks
Acid 0.1N HCl 2 hr 60°C Partial degradation observed
Oxidation 3% H2O2 1 hr RT Significant degradation

Annexure-3: Degradation Profile Summary

Condition Degradation (%) New Peak RT Peak Purity Conclusion
Acid 12.5 7.3 min Pure Acceptable
Oxidation 28.6 6.9 min Impure Requires resolution improvement

Annexure-4: Forced Degradation Report Format

Section Content Summary
Objective To evaluate method specificity under stressed conditions
Conditions Applied Acid, Base, Oxidation, Heat, Light
Results Summary All major degradants resolved; peak purity established
Conclusion Method qualifies as stability-indicating

Revision History:

Revision Date Revision No. Details Reason Approved By
04/05/2025 2.0 Expanded stress conditions and updated annexure templates Regulatory alignment
See also  Analytical Method Development: Training Matrix for AMD Analysts - V 2.0
Analytical Method Development V 2.0 Tags:Analytical Method Development SOP, SOP for analytical calculations, SOP for analytical documentation, SOP for analytical instrument calibration, SOP for analytical instrument qualification, SOP for analytical method change control, SOP for analytical method deviation handling, SOP for analytical method documentation practices, SOP for analytical method lifecycle management, SOP for analytical method optimization, SOP for analytical method risk assessment, SOP for analytical method training and competency, SOP for analytical method transfer protocol, SOP for analytical method validation, SOP for forced degradation studies, SOP for HPLC method development, SOP for limit of detection (LOD) determination, SOP for limit of quantitation (LOQ) determination, SOP for method accuracy testing, SOP for method linearity assessment, SOP for method precision evaluation, SOP for method reproducibility, SOP for method robustness testing, SOP for method transfer, SOP for method verification, SOP for qualification of working standards, SOP for reference standard handling, SOP for specificity testing in analytical methods, SOP for stability indicating methods, SOP for system suitability testing

Post navigation

Previous Post: API Manufacturing: SOP for Seeding Techniques in Crystallization – V 2.0
Next Post: Aerosol: SOP for Revalidating Cleaning Processes After Modifications – V 2.0

Standard Operating Procedures V 1.0

  • Aerosols
  • Analytical Method Development
  • Bioequivalence Bioavailability Study
  • Capsule Formulation
  • Clinical Studies
  • Creams
  • Data Integrity
  • Dental Dosage Forms
  • Drug Discovery
  • Environment, Health and Safety
  • Formulation Development
  • Gels
  • Good Distribution Practice
  • Good Warehousing Practices
  • In-Process Control
  • Injectables
  • Liquid Orals
  • Liposome and Emulsion Formulations
  • Lotions
  • Lyophilized Products
  • Maintenance Dept.
  • Medical Devices
  • Metered-Dose Inhaler
  • Microbiology Testing
  • Nanoparticle Formulation
  • Nasal Spray Formulations
  • Nebulizers
  • Ocular (Eye) Dosage Forms
  • Ointments
  • Otic (Ear) Dosage Forms
  • Pharmacovigilance
  • Powder & Granules
  • Purchase Departments
  • Quality Assurance
  • Quality Control
  • Raw Material Stores
  • Regulatory Affairs
  • Tablet Manufacturing
  • Rectal Dosage Forms
  • Transdermal Patches
  • Vaginal Dosage Forms
  • Validations and Qualifications

Read SOPs in your Language:

 - 
Bengali
 - 
bn
English
 - 
en
Gujarati
 - 
gu
Hindi
 - 
hi
Malayalam
 - 
ml
Marathi
 - 
mr
Punjabi
 - 
pa
Tamil
 - 
ta
Telugu
 - 
te

NEW! Revised SOPs – V 2.0

  • Aerosols V 2.0
  • Analytical Method Development V 2.0
  • API Manufacturing V 2.0
  • BA-BE Studies V 2.0
  • Biosimilars V 2.0
  • Capsules V 2.0
  • Creams V 2.0
  • Elixers V 2.0
  • Ointments V 2.0
  • Raw Material Warehouse V 2.0
  • Tablet Manufacturing V2.0

New Publication: A must for All.

Copyright © 2025 SOP Guide for Pharma.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

Go to mobile version